检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈燕萍[1]
机构地区:[1]上海大学图书情报档案系
出 处:《档案管理》2018年第4期49-53,共5页Archives Management
摘 要:本文以中国第一历史档案馆、第二历史档案馆和美国国家档案馆为比较对象,基于文献调查和网站分析,发现中美档案文化产品在政策支持、理论基础两方面存在相同点,并且从理念建设、资源建设、形象塑造、人性化服务和综合效益五大方面比较了二者的不同点。文章认为中美公共档案馆发展历程和中美公民权利意识的差异是导致二者不同的原因,同时总结了美国国家档案馆在创意设计、跨界合作、公众参与和社会资源运用方面为中国提供的经验。This paper compares the first Historical Archives of China, the second Historical Archives and the National Archives of the United States, based on literature survey and website analysis. It is found that there are similarities between Chinese and American archival products in terms of policy support and theoretical basis. And from the concept construction, the resources construction, the image shaping, the humanity service and the comprehensive benefit five aspects compares the difference between the two. The article holds that the development course of Chinese and American public archives and the difference of civil rights consciousness between China and the United States are the reasons for the difference between the two. At the same time, it summarizes the experience of the National Archives of the United States in creative design, cross-border cooperation, public participation and the use of social resources for China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222