检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孜里米拉.艾尼瓦尔 Zilimila Ainiwaer(Intellectual Property Right Institute,Zhongnan University of Economics and law,Wuhan City,Hubei Province,43000)
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学知识产权研究中心,湖北武汉430000
出 处:《黄河科技大学学报》2018年第4期112-117,共6页Journal of Huanghe S&T University
摘 要:图书馆著作权例外条款是实现图书馆公共职能的法律保障,是知识产权利益平衡机制的具体体现。我国现行的《著作权法》为图书馆只规定了"保存"例外,对"替换"例外、数字文献传递、馆际互借等使用作品的行为并没有规定著作权例外,导致很难满足图书馆在数字环境下开展其业务的实际需求。美国《版权法》正在修订关于图书馆著作权例外条款,在其最新的讨论稿中包含的图书馆例外的示范条款为数字环境下图书馆、档案馆和博物馆提供了广泛的实际利益。《著作权法》第三次修订应回应新技术带来的法律风险,同时适当借鉴美国《版权法》最新发展动态来完善我国的图书馆的著作权例外规定,对图书馆界应对数字化技术带来的新挑战具有现实意义。Library copyright exception clause,as the legal guarantee to realize the public function of library,also embodies the balance mechanism for the benefit of intellectual property right. The Copyright Law in China at present only stipulates the exception of "preservation"for the library,and has no exception stipulations for other behaviors using the books such as "replacement",digital document transfer,or interlibrary services etc,so it is difficult to satisfy the practical need of the library to carry out its business in the digital environment. US Copyright Law is now revising the exception clause about library copyright,and in its latest discussion draft,the model clauses for library exception may provide extensive practical benefit for libraries,archives,and museums. The third revision of Copyright Law should make response to the legal risks brought by the new technology,and at the same time,and borrow the newest dynamic development of US Copyright Law to complete the exception stipulations for the library copyright in China. This effort will have practical significance for libraries to face the challenges brought by digital technology.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15