民国历史教科书中的戊戌维新及康有为  

The Reform Movement of 1898 and Kang Youwei in History Textbooks in the Republic of China

作　　者：李帆[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学历史学院

出　　处：《广东社会科学》2018年第4期112-120,255,共9页Social Sciences in Guangdong

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目"清末民国时期的中国历史教科书与中华民族认同研究"(项目号16AZS012)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：历史教科书对于戊戌维新及康有为的叙述,有个由隐至显的历程,清季尚属敏感话题,只能不写或简单的一笔带过;民初虽突破禁区,予之以正面评价,但史实层面未做过多扩展;直到1922年学制改革后的叙述,才在篇幅上大大超越此前,对史实的把握和价值的判断,也为后世所取法;1928年国民政府成立后的书写,则在以往基础上达至高峰。这些叙述具有鲜明特色,在总体框架和宏观架构上,一致性较为突出,但也绝非千篇一律,至于具体内容的表述,特别是对于康有为等人物和重要事件,则有细节描绘和学术考辨。在能够依凭的研究成果十分有限的前提下,民国历史教科书编者所构建的戊戌维新史实,所塑造的康有为形象,规范乃至影响了当时及此后的相关学术研究,这一现象非常值得关注。There had been a gradual development in the reviews of the Reform Movement of 1898 and Kang Youwei in the history textbooks from the late Qing dynasty to the Republic of China.The Reform Movement of 1898 and Kang Youwei was a sensitive topic in the late Qing Dynasty,so it was not examined or even mentioned in the history textbooks.There were positive reviews of the Reform Movement of 1898 and Kang Youwei in the history textbooks in the early Republic of China,but a systematic examination was absent.There was a systematic review of the Reform Movement of 1898 and Kang Youwei in the textbooks after the reform of the school system of 1922,and the review was recognized as valid by the later scholars.Based on the existing studies,there was a more systematic examination of the reform in the textbooks after the establishment of the National Government in 1928.There were both uniformity and differences in these narrations in different periods.Both the descriptions of the details and the academic examinations of the reform were presented in the textbooks.The reviews of the Reform Movement of 1898 and Kang Youwei in the history textbooks in the Republic of China had an impact on the subsequent studies of the Reform Movement of 1898 and Kang Youwei,and deserve further research.

关 键 词：民国历史教科书 戊戌维新 康有为 

分 类 号：K256.5[历史地理—历史学]