以“相对所有权”解析分时度假权益之法律特质  

The Analysis on the Legal Characteristics of Timeshare Right by “Relative Ownership”

作　　者：任容庆 REN Rong-qing(Institute of Applied Jurisprudence of China,Supreme People’s Court,Beijing 100062,China)

机构地区：[1]最高人民法院中国应用法学研究所,北京100062

出　　处：《天津法学》2018年第2期37-44,共8页Tianjin Legal Science

摘　　要：分时度假是结合分时与交换概念的新型旅游消费产品,有关分时度假权属性质的界定,理论界一直颇有争议。传统大陆法系的绝对所有权观念,一物一权主义和物权法定原则,使得运用大陆法系物权理论界定分时度假权属性质时不可避免地存在一定的局限性,同时也制约着分时度假在我国的发展。而英美财产法上的第四维时间分割理念、普通法Estate之共有权益和衡平法Estate之信托权益,则为分时度假在欧美各国的发展铺平了理论道路。为扫清分时度假权属界定的理论障碍,可尝试引入"相对所权"观念,来准确分析分时度假权益所具有的期限分割、绝对性弱化、排他性受限、用益交换一体的法律特质。Timesharing is a new kind of tourism consumption products which combines the concept of time-sharing and exchange. There always has been a great dispute about the definition of the ownership nature of timesharing in the theoretical realm. When property theory of continental legal system is used to definite the ownership nature of timesharing,absolute ownership concept, statutory principle of real right and property prescribed principle from the traditional continental legal system has unavoidable limitation, meanwhile it re-stricts the development of timesharing in China. In Anglo American Property Law, the fourth dimensional time segmentation idea,common interest of Estate in Common Law and trust interest of Estate in Equity Law of the common property law pave the way for the development of timesharing. In order to clear the theoretical barri-ers of the definition of the ownership nature of timesharing, it is necessary to accurately analyze timesharing legal characteristics of term segmentation, weaken absolutely, restrict exclusively and usufructuarily exchange with ＂relative ownership＂ concept.

关 键 词：分时度假 权属性质 两大法系 相对所有权 

分 类 号：D913.2[政治法律—民商法学]