穴位埋线结合整体护理治疗围绝经期综合征的临床研究  

Clinical Study of Acupoint Thread Embedding plus General Nursing Care for Perimenopausal Syndrome

作　　者：黄玉英[1] Huang Yu-ying.(Leshan Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Leshan 614000, China)

机构地区：[1]乐山市中医医院,乐山614000

出　　处：《上海针灸杂志》2018年第7期763-768,共6页Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion

基　　金：国家自然科学基金资助项目(81173322)

摘　　要：目的观察穴位埋线结合整体护理治疗围绝经期综合征的临床疗效。方法将100例围绝经期综合征患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组50例。对照组采用穴位埋线治疗,治疗组在对照组基础上加上整体护理。观察两组患者治疗前后的Kupperman绝经指数评分变化,并比较两组临床疗效。结果两组治疗后Kupperman积分均较治疗前降低(P<0.05,P<0.01);两组治疗前后Kupperman积分差值比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。两组临床疗效比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。治疗组愈显率和总有效率为72.0%和96.0%,优于对照组的50.0%和82.0%(P<0.05)。结论穴位埋线结合整体护理治疗围绝经期综合征疗效确切。Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of acupoint thread embedding plus general nursing care in treating perimenopausal syndrome（PMS）. Method One hundred PMS patients were randomized into a treatment group and a control group, with 50 cases in each group. The control group was intervened by acupoint thread embedding, while the treatment group was additionally given general nursing care. The two groups of patients were evaluated by using the Kupperman Index（KI） before and after the intervention, and the clinical efficacies were compared. Result The KI scores decreased significantly after the intervention in both groups after the intervention（P〈0.05, P〈0.01）; after the treatment, there was a significant difference in the change of KI score between the two groups（P〈0.01）. The between-group difference in the clinical efficacy was statistically significant（P〈0.01）. The markedly effective rate and total effective rate were respectively 72.0% and 96.0% in the treatment group, significantly better than 50.0% and 82.0% in the control group（P〈0.05）. Conclusion Acupoint thread embedding plus general nursing care is effective for PMS.

关 键 词：围绝经期综合征 埋线 埋藏疗法 护理 

分 类 号：R246.3[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]