检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈嘉妮 陈继樑 邓刚 杨开明 Chen Jiani;Chen Jiliang;Deng Gang;Yang Kaiming(Pre-elinieal College,Dali University,Dali,Yunnan 671000,China;Dali Dianxi Judicial Expertise Center,Dali,Yunnan 671000,China)
机构地区:[1]大理大学基础医学院,云南大理671000 [2]大理滇西司法鉴定中心,云南大理671000
出 处:《大理大学学报》2018年第8期80-82,共3页Journal of Dali University
摘 要:外伤引起膈肌破裂、膈疝,在临床外科及法医鉴定中并不常见,对于外伤性膈肌破裂、膈疝,在我国司法鉴定人体轻、重伤评定标准中也没有专门的规定。现行的《人体损伤程度鉴定标准》只将膈肌破裂列入重伤二级,对于一些特殊情况导致的膈肌破裂未进行规定,只能比照《人体损伤程度鉴定标准》的相近条款进行鉴定,与实际损伤情况并不相符。通过对2例膈肌破裂的鉴定案件进行具体分析,对现行的膈肌破裂损伤程度法医学鉴定标准进行探讨。Traumatic diaphragmatic rupture and diaphragmatic hernia are uncommon in both clinical surgery and forensic identification. And there are also no special provisions in our judicial identification to evaluate traumatic diaphragmatic rupture and diaphragmatic hernia. The current standards of the identification of body injury degree only point out that the diaphragmatic rupture is classified as serious injury Ⅱ, but as for the other special circumstances leading to rupture of the diaphragm no provisions are mentioned, so we can only follow the similar terms to assess, which sometimes might not be consistent with the actual damage. This article discusses the current standards of forensic identification of diaphragmatic rupture in human body injury through analysis of 2 cases with diaphragmatic rupture.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.69