检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:潘俊博[1] 吴春彪[1] 马福元[1] 卞正君 PAN Junbo;WU Chunbiao;MA Fuyuan;BIAN Zhengjun(Department of Orthopedics,Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University,Yangzhou,Jiangsu,22500)
出 处:《实用临床医药杂志》2018年第17期82-83,86,共3页Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice
摘 要:目的比较单人足蹬复位法与传统复位方法复位桡骨远端骨折的效果。方法将60例桡骨远端骨折患者(A2、A3、C1型)随机分为2组,分别采用单人足蹬复位法和传统双人复位法。比较2种方法的牵引拉力、拉力可控性、身体其他部位可否辅助复位、牵引时间、整体操作时间、施治人数、手套数及即刻复位成功率。结果单人足蹬复位法在上述指标方面均优于传统复位法。结论单人足蹬复位法可缩短复位时间、节省人力物力,且即刻复位成功率高于传统复位法。Objective To compare effect of one-man pedal method versus traditional method in distal radius fracture restoration of patients. Methods A total of 30 patients with distal radial fractures( type A1,A3,C1) were randomly divided into one-man pedal method group and traditional two-man pedal group,given one-man pedal method and traditional method,respectively. Traction force,controllability of pull force,assisted restoration of other parts of the body,traction time,overall operation time,patients with treatment,number of gloves and success rate of immediate restoration of two groups were compared. Results One-man pedal method had better efficacy in above indicators as compared to traditional method. Conclusion One-man pedal method can shorten restoration time,save manpower and material sources,and has higher success rate than traditional method.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38