屈原作品篇目及真伪探究的疏理与思考  

Review of Debates on the Content and Authenticity of Qu Yuan's Works

作　　者：龚红林[1] GONG Honglin(School of Chinese Language and Literature,Hunan Institute of Science and Technology, Yueyang 414006, Chin)

机构地区：[1]湖南理工学院中国语言文学学院,湖南岳阳414006

出　　处：《云梦学刊》2018年第4期31-37,116,共8页Journal of Yunmeng

基　　金：国家社科基金后期资助项目(15FWZ005)

摘　　要：关于屈原作品篇目及真伪问题的争辩出现于东汉,发生激烈争论是宋代以后,20世纪80年代曾引起一场国际性辩论。两千多年间,屈原作品篇目、真伪的论争不断升级:在研究目的上由"篇目数量之争"升级为"作品著作权之争(屈原作品真伪之争)",进而升级为"屈原其人真实存在性之争";研究方法上由"依据作品内证"到"依据文献典籍"再到"依据出土文物"。目前的出土文献只解决了《楚辞章句》在诗句文字、序文、注释上的校正问题。The dispute about Qu Yuan＇s works on the content and authenticity of the book appeared in the Eastern Han Dynasty.After the Song Dynasty, a heated debate took place in the 1980 s and caused an international debate. The debates on the content and authenticity of Qu Yuan＇s works over 2,000 years have been continuously upgraded： in terms of research purpose, it has been upgraded from ＂contention disputes＂ to ＂content copyright disputes（Qu Yuan＇s work authenticity disputes）＂, and then it has been upgraded to ＂Qu Yuan＇s real existence dispute＂; The current unearthed literature only solved the problem of the correction of the poems, prefaces, and annotations of The Sentences and Phrases of Chu Ci.

关 键 词：屈原作品 篇目 真伪 争鸣 疏理 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]