检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘洋[1] 胡筱敏[1] 赵研[1] 王军[1] 鲍佳[2] LIU Yang;HU Xiaomin;ZHAO Yan;WANG Jun;BAO Jia(School of Resources and Civil Engineering,Northeastern University,Shenyang,110819,China;School of Science,Shenyang University of Technology,Shenyang,110870,China)
机构地区:[1]东北大学资源与土木工程学院,沈阳110819 [2]沈阳工业大学理学院,沈阳110870
出 处:《环境化学》2018年第8期1860-1868,共9页Environmental Chemistry
基 金:国家自然科学基金(21507092;51678118)资助~~
摘 要:全氟化合物(PFCs)及其替代品是具有污染持久性、生物毒性和累积性的氟烃类化合物,严重威胁生态系统乃至人类健康.已有PFCs及其替代品的处理技术主要包括吸附、电化学氧化等,各技术的去除效果和适用范围不尽相同.目前我国缺少针对PFCs及其替代品处理技术的系统总结和对比研究.为了选择适合且有效的技术去除PFCs及其替代品污染物,本文详细介绍了近年来处理该类污染物的常用技术,从去除效果、去除机理及适用性等方面对比不同技术的优势与不足,并展望不同技术的发展趋势,为我国PFCs及其替代品的有效治理与控制提供科学依据.Perfluorinated compounds( PFCs) and their alternatives are fluorinated hydrocarbons,which are persistent,toxic,and bioaccumulative,posing potential threats to the biosystems and even human health. So far,several treating techniques including adsorption and electrochemistry for PFCs and their alternatives have been developed,yet their removal efficiencies and applications are extremely different. Moreover,little systematic review and comparative research is available about the treating techniques for PFCs and their alternatives. In order to screen a suitable and effective removal technique for PFCs and their alternatives,extensive details were summarized from treating techniques in recent years. Based upon the comparisons among the removal efficiencies,removal mechanisms,applicability,advantages,and disadvantages of those techniques,and further analysis of their developing trends,a scientific basis for the effective treatment of PFCs and their alternatives could be provided.
关 键 词:全氟化合物(PFCs) 替代品 处理技术 去除效果 对比研究
分 类 号:X703[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15