江苏省东台市居民生活环境与主观幸福感的关联  

Relationship between living environment and subjective well-being of residents in Dongtai City,Jiangsu Province

作　　者：吴宁[1] 戴俊明[1] 陈张 李赞 钱进华 高俊岭[1] 王忠泽[3] 傅华[1] WU Ning;DAf Jun-ming;CHEN Zhang;LI Zan;QIAN Jin-hua;GAO Jun-ling;WANG Zhong-ze;FU Hua(School of Public Health,Institute of Health Communication,Key Lab of Public Health Safety of Ministry of Education,Collaborative Innovation Center of Health Risk Early Warning and Governance,Fudan University,Shanghai 200032,China;Assistant Director＇s Room,Dongtai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning,Dongtai,Jiangsu 224200,China;Director＇s Room,Dongtai Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Dongtai,Jiangsu 224200,China）.)

机构地区：[1]复旦大学公共卫生学院复旦大学健康传播研究所教育部公共卫生安全重点实验室健康风险预警治理协同创新中心,上海200032 [2]东台市卫生与计划生育委员会副主任室,江苏东台224200 [3]东台市疾病预防控制中心主任室,江苏东台224200

出　　处：《环境与职业医学》2018年第8期729-734,共6页Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine

摘　　要：[目的]了解江苏省东台市居民的主观幸福感现状,探究生活环境与幸福感间的关联,为制定合适可行的居民主观幸福感促进方案提供依据。[方法]2017年8—9月,运用配额抽样方法选择东台市14个乡镇的3 665位常住居民进行问卷调查,所有调查对象知情同意并匿名、自主完成问卷填写,选用个人幸福指数量表评估主观幸福感,生活环境评估量表包括美观程度、健身环境、服务与治安、环境质量4个子量表。运用单因素方差分析检验幸福感在不同个体特征间的差异;多因素回归模型分析生活环境与幸福感的关联。[结果]问卷有效率为79.3%。调查对象主观幸福感总分为(7.38±1.76)分,并在不同年龄、受教育程度、婚姻和经济状况的居民间存在统计学差异(均P<0.05)。多因素分析显示:在调整人口学特征后,以低水平组为对照,美观程度中、高水平组的OR分别为1.52(95%CI:1.23~1.89)和2.97(95%CI:2.25~3.92);健身环境中、高水平组的OR分别为1.11(95%CI:0.89~1.37)和1.64(95%CI:1.27~2.11);服务与治安中、高水平组的OR分别为1.08(95%CI:0.87~1.33)和1.81(95%CI:1.40~2.34);环境质量中、高水平组的OR分别为1.57(95%CI:1.27~1.94)和2.77(95%CI:2.12~3.61)。[结论]生活环境会影响居民主观幸福感水平,优良的生活环境可能是居民主观幸福感的保护因素。[Objective] To investigate the current status of subjective well-being among residents in Dongtai City of Jiangsu Province,assess its association with living environment,and provide a basis for formulating a feasible residents＇ subjective well-being promotion program.[Methods] From August to September 2017,a total of 3 665 residents from 14 towns in Dongtai were selected by quota sampling method to complete questionnaires in an anonymous way with informed consent.Subjective well-being was assessed with Personal Well-being Index,and living environment was assessed in four dimensions：neighborhood aesthetics,fitness environment,public service and safety,and quality of environment.One-way ANOVA was applied to test the difference in subjective well-being among residents grouped by demographic characteristics,and multi-factor analysis was used to assess the relationship between living environment and subjective well-being.[Results] The valid response rate was 79.3%.The total score of subjective well-being of residents was 7.38±1.76,and the differences were significant among subjects with different ages,education levels,marital status,and economic status（Ps0.05）.After being adjusted for demographic characteristics,the results of multi-factor analysis on subject well-being showed that compared with those with low level,the OR（95%CI） of residents with medium and high levels of aesthetics were 1.52（1.23-1.89） and 2.97（2.25-3.92） respectively;the OR（95%CI） of residents with medium and high levels of fitness environment were 1.11（0.89-1.37） and 1.64（1.27-2.11） respectively;the OR（95%CI） of residents with medium and high levels of public service and safety were 1.08（0.87-1.33） and 1.81（1.40-2.34） respectively;the OR（95%CI） of residents with medium and high levels of environmental quality were 1.57（1.27-1.94） and 2.77（2.12-3.61） respectively.[Conclusion] Living environment affects residents＇ subjective well-being,and good living environment could be a protective factor

关 键 词：居民 生活环境 主观幸福感 美观程度 健身环境 服务与治安 环境质量 

分 类 号：R126.8[医药卫生—环境卫生学]