检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:韩佳[1] 张先杰[1] 周裕凯[1] 鞠峰[1] Han Jia;Zhang Xianjie;Zhou Yukai;Ju Feng(The People's Hospital of Deyang Deyang,Sichuan 618000 China)
出 处:《医药前沿》2018年第19期15-16,共2页Journal of Frontiers of Medicine
摘 要:目的:比较使用改良持针法和使用传统持针法进行桡动脉穿刺置管的成功率。方法:选取300例需要术中进行有创动脉压监测的患者,统一选择患者的左手桡动脉作为穿刺动脉,随机分为对照组和实验组各150例,实验组采用改良持针法,对照组采用传统持针法。结果:两组穿刺成功例数分别为137例、112例,差异显著,P〈0.05;其中实验组的第一次穿刺成功率高于对照组,P〈0.05差异有统计学意义。结论:改良持针法可以有效的提高桡动脉穿刺置管成功率。Objective To compare the success rate of radial artery catheterization with modified needle holding and traditional needle holding. Methods 300 patients who needed invasive arterial pressure monitoring during operation were selected. The left radial artery was randomly divided into control group and experimental group, and the experimental group was treated with modified needle holding method. The control group was treated with traditional acupuncture method. Results The number of successful puncture cases in the two groups was 112 cases (137 cases), the difference was significant (P 〈 0.05), and the success rate of the first puncture in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion Improvement Acupuncture can effectively improve the success rate of radial artery catheterization.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:52.14.187.136