检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林英 谢瑾卉[1] 刘欣宇 臧超群[1] 于舒怡[1] 黄玉茜[2] 梁春浩[1] LIN Ying;XIE Jin-hui;LIU Xin-yu;ZANG Chao-qun;YU Shu-yi;HUANG Yu-qian;LIANG Chun-hao(Liaoning Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Shenyang,Liaoning 110161;Shenyang Agricultural University,Shenyang,Liaoning 110866)
机构地区:[1]辽宁省农业科学院,辽宁沈阳110161 [2]沈阳农业大学,辽宁沈阳110866
出 处:《辽宁农业科学》2018年第4期33-36,共4页Liaoning Agricultural Sciences
基 金:辽宁省博士启动基金(20170520173);辽宁省"百千万人才工程"人选科技活动项目;辽宁省地方标准
摘 要:采用自然病圃检测法,分别对34种花生品种(系)进行了花生褐斑病抗性评价,以期为抗病育种及田间病害防治提供理论依据。研究结果表明,不同花生品种间对花生褐斑病的抗性存在着显著差异,供试34个花生品种中没有对褐斑病免疫的品种,高抗品种3个,中抗品种9个,抗病品种11个,感病品种8个,高感品种3个。聚类分析结果表明,翼9801等6个品种抗性较好,可进一步加以利用。In this study, 34 peanut varieties were evaluated for their resistance to brown spot disease by natu- ral bed test, in order to provide theoretical basis for resistance bleeding and field Disease control. The results showed that peanut brown spot disease was diffm^nt between different peanut varieties. The following conclu-sions showed : there were no immune against brown spot disease in 34 peanut varieties, 3 high resistance varieties,9 resistant varieties, 11 resistant varieties, 9 susceptible varieties and 3 sensitive varieties. The results of cluster analysis showed that 6 varieties had good resistance and could be used further.
分 类 号:S435.652[农业科学—农业昆虫与害虫防治]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28