浅析可能行为人分担损害的民事补偿——以《侵权责任法》第87条为中心  

An Analysis of Civil Compensation for Possible Actors to Share Damages——Focus on Article 87 of the Tort Liability Law

作　　者：高林娜 GAO Lin-na(School of Law,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450001,China)

机构地区：[1]郑州大学法学院,河南郑州450001

出　　处：《信阳农林学院学报》2018年第3期19-22,29,共5页Journal of Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University

摘　　要：《侵权责任法》第87条为可能行为人分担损害提供了法律依据,但由于其规定内容宽泛,使得在实践中出现民事补偿承担的主体扩大,法律条文规定的担责标准难以证明等问题,由此导致该条文在实践中难以适用。可能行为人分担损害的民事补偿就目前而言只出现在侵权责任法的第87条,但是其在立法上产生了非同一般的反响。实际行为人承担责任是私法上重要的一项原则,此种补偿形式扩大了责任的承担主体,是对传统私法理念和原则的一大挑战。但该条文的规定也充分体现了我国侵权责任法为救济法的立法理念。现阶段,我国民事相关法律对于民事补偿的参照标准没有明确的法律规定,司法实践中各地区的做法也不一致。Article 87 of the Tort Liability Law provides a legal basis for possible actors to share damages. Because of its broad provi- sions, the subject of civil compensation is expanded in practice. And the standard of liability stipulated in the law is difficult to prove. Perhaps the civil compensation for the actors＇sharing of damages only appears in article 87 of the Tort Liability Law at present, it has produced an unusual legislative response. Actual actorg liability is an important principle in private law. This form of compensation en- larges the subject of liability and challenges of the traditional ideas and principles of private law. However, the provisions of this article also fully reflect the legislative concept of tort liability law as relief law in China. At present, there is no clear legal provision for the reference standard of civil compensation in the relevant civil laws of our country, and the practices of different regions in judicial prac- tice are not consistent.

关 键 词：可能行为人 民事补偿 范围 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]