检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:梁正仪[1] LIA NG Zheng-yi(Department of Gyneeology and Obstetries,Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital in Jiangxi Provinee,Nanehang 330046,China)
出 处:《中国当代医药》2018年第23期139-141,共3页China Modern Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨不同引产方式对中期妊娠引产效果。方法回顾性分析我院2013年3月~2018年3月收治的100例中期妊娠引产患者临床资料,根据引产方法不同分为观察组和对照组,每组各50例。观察组采用米非司酮联合米索前列醇药物进行引产,对照组采取乳酸依沙吖啶进行引产,对比分析两组引产成功率、引产时间及引产后出血量、患者并发症及满意率。结果观察组的引产成功率为100.00%,显著高于对照组(92.00%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组的引产时间短于对照组,引产后出血量少于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01);观察组的并发症总发生率为2.00%,低于对照组14.00%,观察组的总满意率为98.00%,高于对照组(82.00%),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论中期妊娠引产方式较多,米非司酮联合米索前列醇中期妊娠引产成功率高,引产时间短、出血量少、并发症低,安全性高,且患者满意率高,值得临床推广应用。Objective To explore the effect of different induced labor on midterm pregnancy induced labor. Methods The clinical data of 100 cases of intermediate pregnancy induced labor from March 2013 to March 2018 were analyzed retrospectively, according to the different induction methods, they were divided into the observation group and the control group, 50 cases in each group. The observation group was used Mifepristone combined with Misoprostol for induction of labor, the control group was took Rivanol for induction of labor, comparative analysis of the two groups of patients with the success rate of labor induction, induction of labor and postpartum hemorrhage, patient complications and satisfaction rate. Results The success rate of the patients in the observation group was up to 100.00%, significantly higher than that in the control group 92.00%, and the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05). In the observation group, the induced labor time was shorter than that in the control group, and the blood loss was lesser than that in the control group, the differences were statistically significant(P〈0.01). The total incidence rate of complication was 2.00%in the observation group, compared with the control group of 14.00%, and the total satisfaction rate was 98.00%, which was higher than in the control group(82.00%), and the differences were statistically significant(P〈0.05). Conclusion Period of pregnancy induced labor way more, Mifepristone combined Misoprostol mid pregnancy induced labor success rate is high, the induced labor of short time, less blood loss and complication rate low, high safety, and patient satisfaction is high, is worth popularization and application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3