检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张向华 ZHANG Xiang-hua(Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Huyi District, Xi'an 710300, China)
机构地区:[1]陕西省西安市鄠邑区妇幼保健院,陕西西安710300
出 处:《临床医学研究与实践》2018年第24期197-198,共2页Clinical Research and Practice
摘 要:目的探讨在小儿上呼吸道感染雾化吸入治疗中应用舒适护理对患儿症状缓解率的影响。方法将80例上呼吸道感染患儿按随机数表分为常规组(n=40,行常规基础护理)和舒适组(n=40,行舒适护理干预)。对比两组的护理效果。结果舒适组患儿症状改善率为95.0%,明显高于常规组的75.0%(P<0.05);舒适组患儿的住院时间和雾化吸入不良反应总发生率均明显优于常规组(P<0.05);护理后,两组患儿的舒适度评分均显著升高,且舒适组明显高于常规组(P<0.05)。结论在小儿上呼吸道感染雾化吸入治疗中运用舒适护理可明显改善患儿疗效及预后,值得临床应用。Objective To investigate the effect of comfort nursing on symptom remission rate in children with upper respiratory tract infection treated with atomization inhalation. Methods Eighty children with upper respiratory tract infection were divided into normal group(n =40, given routine basic nursing) and comfort group(n =40, given comfort nursing intervention) by random number talde. The nursing effects of the two groups were compared. Results The symptom remission rate of children in the comfort group was 95.0%, which was significantly higher than 75.0% in the normal group(P〈0.05). The hospital stays of children and total incidence of adverse reactions during atomization inhalation treatment in the comfort group were significantly better than those in the normal group(P〈0.05). After nursing, the score of comfort in the two groups significantly increased, and that of the comfort group was significantly higher than the normal group(P〈0.05).Conclusion Comfort nursing can significantly improve the efficacy and prognosis of children with upper respiratory tract infection treated with atomization inhalation, which is worthy of clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.158