基本公共文化服务均等化研究——模型构建与实证分析  

Research on the Equalization of Basic Public Cultural Services in China: Model Construction and Empirical Analysis

作　　者：傅才武[1] 张伟锋 Fu Caiwu;Zhang Weifeng(National Institute of Cultural Development in Wuhan Universit)

机构地区：[1]武汉大学国家文化发展研究院

出　　处：《图书馆杂志》2018年第8期4-13,共10页Library Journal

基　　金：国家社会科学基金艺术学重大项目"公共文化服务体系建设和运行中的财政保障标准与保障方式研究"(项目编号:13ZD04);文化部委托项目"文化发展指数研究"的研究成果之一

摘　　要：基于区域均等和结果均等的视角,根据地区间公共文化资源配置的均等化程度构建基本公共文化服务均等化评估指标体系,并提出一种兼具专家打分法、综合指数法、基尼系数法的量化评估模型对2011-2016年我国基本公共文化服务均等化程度进行实证研究。结果显示:我国基本公共文化服务均等化程度不高,已达失衡状态,并且2011-2016年间呈下降趋势;公共文化资源已呈现出东部最优、西部次之、中部"塌陷"态势;公共文化财政投入区域分化严重以及公共文化产品供给区域分化不断加剧是制约基本公共文化服务均等化进程的主因。最后,对实证模型的优势及不足进行了讨论。From the perspective of regional equality and outcome equality, and according to the degree of equalization of public cultural resources between regions, this paper constructs the index system of equal evaluation of basic public cultural services, and puts forward an evaluation method involving expert scoring, comprehensive index and Gini coefficient. It then conducts an empirical study on the equalization level of basic public cultural services in China from 2011 to 2016. The results show that 1） the equalization level of basic public cultural services in China is not high, reaching an unbalanced status and showing a downward trend from 2011 to 2016; 2） in terms of public cultural resources, the situation in the east has been the best, followed by western whereas the central region the worst; 3） the serious regional difference of public cultural financial inputs and the worsening regional difference in the supply of public cultural products are the main factors restricting the process of equalization of basic public cultural services. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages of the empirical model are discussed in this paper.

关 键 词：公共文化服务 均等化 模型构建 实证研究 基尼系数 

分 类 号：G249.2[文化科学]