机构地区:[1]十堰市妇幼保健院妇产科,湖北十堰442000
出 处:《中国微生态学杂志》2018年第7期828-831,840,共5页Chinese Journal of Microecology
基 金:十堰市科技局计划项目(ZD2011009)
摘 要:目的观察妊娠中晚期妇女阴道微生态状况,探讨应用乳杆菌活菌胶囊纠正阴道微生态失调对不良妊娠结局的预防价值。方法选择孕13~36周单胎妊娠期妇女560例,取其阴道分泌物,经革兰染色后油镜下观察,进行阴道微生态(阴道菌群的密集度、多样性、优势菌、炎症反应等)状况评价,检测阴道分泌物成分、阴道病原菌类型。对阴道微生态失调孕妇,根据是否接受乳杆菌活菌胶囊治疗分为治疗组和对照组,治疗组给予乳杆菌活菌胶囊,对照组不采用药物干预。追踪随访所有孕妇的妊娠情况,比较阴道微生态正常组、微生态失调治疗组及微生态失调对照组的不良妊娠结局。结果 560例研究对象中,阴道微生态正常335例(59.82%),微生态失调225例(40.18%)。225例微生态失调孕妇中,细菌性阴道病(bacterial vaginosis,BV)32例(14.22%),阴道假丝酵母菌病(vulvovaginal candidiasis,VVC)56例(24.89%),滴虫性阴道炎(triehomonal vaginitis,TV)11例(4.89%),BV和VVC混合感染4例(1.78%),BV和TV混合感染3例(1.33%),菌群增殖过度75例(33.33%),菌群抑制44例(19.56%)。微生态失调组pH值>4.5、过氧化氢、白细胞酯酶、唾液酸苷酶、脯氨酸氨基肽酶、乙酰氨基葡萄糖苷酶阳性比例均明显高于微生态正常组(χ2=55.59~340.06,Ps<0.05)。微生态失调孕妇中,治疗组135例,对照组90例,对照组胎膜早破、早产、产褥感染、新生儿感染及低出生体重儿发生率均明显高于微生态正常组(χ2=12.63~32.42,Ps<0.05)和微生态失调治疗组(χ2=5.16~12.28,Ps<0.05),微生态正常组与微生态失调治疗组之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论妊娠中晚期容易导致阴道微生态失调,造成不良妊娠结局,乳杆菌活菌胶囊纠正阴道微生态失调对于改善不良妊娠结局有较好的预防作用。Objective To observe the vaginal microecology of pregnant women in mid-and late-term pregnancy and explore the preventive value of Lactobacillus capsule for adverse pregnancy outcomes in correcting vaginal microecological imbalance.Methods 560 singleton pregnant women during 13 to 36 weeks of gestation were selected.The vaginal secretions were examined after Gram staining for inspection of vaginal microecology(vaginal flora density and diversity,dominant bacteria,inflammatory response),vaginal secretion composition and pathogenic bacteria.The patients with vaginal microecological imbalance were divided into treatment group and control group according to whether they received Lactobacillus capsule therapy.The treatment group was treated with Lactobacillus capsule,while the control group did not receive drug intervention.All the pregnant women were followed up.The rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes were compared between the normal control group,microecological imbalance treatment group and microecological imbalance control group.Results The rate of normal vaginal microecology was 59.82%(335/560),while that of microecological imbalance was 40.18%(225/560).Among the 225 cases of vaginal microecological imbalance,bacterial vaginosis(BV),vulvovaginal candidiasis(VVC)and aerobe vaginosis(AV)accounted for 32 cases(14.22%),56 cases(24.89%)and 11 cases(4.89%)respectively;mixed infection of BV and VVC,mixed infection of BV and TV,excessive proliferation of bacteria and bacterial growth inhibition accounted for 4 cases(1.78%),3 cases(1.33%),75 cases(33.33%)and 44 cases(19.56%)respectively.The positive rates of pH4.5,catalase,leukocyte esterase,sialidase,proline aminopeptidase and acetyl glucosidase in the microecological imbalance group were significantly higher than those in the normal microecology group(χ^2=55.59~340.06,Ps0.05).Among pregnant women with vaginal microecological imbalance(135 cases in treatment group,90 cases in control group),the rates of prema
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...