检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:田刚[1] 吴天博[1] 张滨[1] Tian Gang;Wu Tianbo;Zhang Bin(College of Economics and Management,Northeast Forestry University,Harbin 150040,China)
机构地区:[1]东北林业大学经济管理学院
出 处:《世界林业研究》2018年第4期86-90,共5页World Forestry Research
基 金:黑龙江省教育厅人文社会科学项目“黑龙江省对俄远东地区森林资源开发战略的研究”(12544022)
摘 要:亚太地区拥有丰富的森林资源,中国与亚太地区主要国家林业经贸合作前景十分广阔。文中运用显性比较优势指数、贸易互补性指数和产业内贸易指数分别对2006—2015年中国与亚太主要国家木质林产品贸易的竞争性与互补性进行分析,结果表明:与亚太主要国家相比,中国木质林产品竞争力较弱,但与其贸易互补性很强。中国应积极加快木质林产品结构转型,提升产品质量以增强竞争力,并利用贸易互补性扩大与亚太主要国家的林产品贸易规模,实现区域互利共赢。Asia-Pacific region is rich in forest resources, and its cooperation with China in forestry economics and trade has a bright and broad future. Using the explicit comparative advantage RAC index,trade complementarity index and intra-industry trade GL index,this paper analyzed the competitiveness and complementarity of trade in wood products between China and Asia-Pacific countries from 2006 to 2015,respectively. The results showed that the competitiveness of wood products from China is weak but the complementarity is very strong. China should actively foster the transformation of wood product structure and improve product quality to enhance the competitiveness,and also use the trade complementarity to expand the scale of trade with the Asia-Pacific countries so as to achieve the regional mutual benefits and win-win.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3