《文心雕龙》辨体批评方法与玄学思潮  

Critical Methods and Metaphysical Trends in Dragon Carving And The Literary Mind

作　　者：郑升[1,2] Zheng Sheng(Department of Chinese Language and Literature,Guangxi Normal University,Guilin 541004;Department of Chinese Language and Literature,Yuxi Normal University,Yuxi 65310)

机构地区：[1]广西师范大学文学院,广西桂林541004 [2]玉溪师范学院文学院,云南玉溪653100

出　　处：《长江大学学报（社会科学版）》2018年第4期44-47,共4页Journal of Yangtze University（Social Sciences Edition）

基　　金：国家社科基金项目(16xzw001)

摘　　要：《文心雕龙》既是文章学巨著,也是一部文体论、方法论的大作。"原始以表末,释名以章义,选文以定篇,敷理以举统",是其中最有代表性的辨体批评方法。这四种方法与当时"本末、辨名析理、品第鉴定、整体把握"的玄学思潮之思维方式、方法有许多通异之处。探究这种通异,有助于我们深入理解《文心雕龙》辨体批评方法之"依经立义""名正言顺""品有所据""举一统万"等内在理路及其特点。Dragon Carving And The Literary Mind is not only a great treatise on prose,but also a masterpiece of stylistics and methodology.“Analyze the original meaning to express the ultimate meaning,explain the name to highlight the meaning,select the article to determine the number of articles,and lay out the truth to govern the full text”,these sentences are the most representative methods of criticism.There are many differences between these four methods and the way and method of thinking in metaphysical thoughts of “initial and final,explain the name to highlight the meaning,selection and identification and holding the whole”.It is helpful for us to deeply understand the inner principles and characteristics of Critical Methods and Metaphysical Trends in Dragon Carving And The Literary Mind ,such as “establishing justice according to the scriptures”,“be perfectly justifiable ”,“providing evidence for the merits” and “unifying everything”.

关 键 词：文心雕龙 辨体批评 玄学 方法 关系 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]