“西方新闻专业主义”的层累构造及其依据  

The Pile-up Construction and Its Basis of Western Journalistic Professionalism

作　　者：陈信凌[1] CHEN Xinling

机构地区：[1]南昌大学新闻与传播学院

出　　处：《国际新闻界》2018年第8期46-58,共13页Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication

基　　金：国家社科基金特别委托项目"西方新闻专业主义研究"(项目编号:14@ZH40)成果

摘　　要：近十年来国内研究界出现了一股阐释"西方新闻专业主义"的热潮。不过,学者们搭建的阐释框架如同顾颉刚眼中的中国古代史观,是"层累地造成的"。它们没有完满地呈现出西方人心目中的新闻专业主义,实质上是中国学者站在中国的语境下,对西方主要是美国新闻专业主义的一种描述乃至想象,展现出更多的是自己关于中国新闻业发展的寄望与愿景。西方学者的一些相关性表述,只是成了借以引发思考和感悟的辅佐性材料。学者们的阐释策略是:在不更改"西方新闻专业主义"典型学术性外观的前提下,通过有意忽略其第一层面的"所指",增添其延伸性义项,极大地扩张了其表意空间,使它成为一个可以纵横捭阖、快意驰骋的场域。There has been an upsurge of interpretation of the term ＂western journalism professionalism＂ in the domestic research field in recent 10 years. However, the interpretive framework that scholars built is ＂caused by pile-up＂, just like Gu Jiegang＇s view of Chinese ancient history. It can＇t fully explain journalistic professionalism that westerns think about, but is only a description or an imagination of the Western, mainly American journalism professionalism, made by Chinese scholars in the context of China. It shows their own expectations and visions for the development of Chinese Journalism. Some western scholars＇ relevant expressions are just the auxiliary material for them to think and feel. What the scholars＇ interpretative strategy is to overlook the first ＂signified＂ level deliberately, to add some extended meanings to expand its ideographic spaces greatly, and to make it a field that can be ramblingly and joyful galloped in the premise of not changing the its typical academic terminology.

关 键 词：西方 新闻专业主义 层累构造 依据 

分 类 号：G210[文化科学—新闻学]