检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:沈晶[1] 苗爱军 Shen Jing;Miao Aijun(Hubei University of Police,Wuhan 430034,China;Yingshan County Public Security Bureau,Yingshan 438700,China)
机构地区:[1]湖北警官学院法律系,湖北武汉430035 [2]湖北英山县公安局,湖北英山438700
出 处:《湖北警官学院学报》2018年第4期34-41,共8页Journal of Hubei University of Police
基 金:湖北省人文社科重点研究基地湖北警官学院社会治安治理研究中心科研项目"<人民警察法>修改中对我国警察盘查制度的立法完善"(2018C006)
摘 要:警察盘查涉及对公民基本权利和自由的限制与影响,需将其合理地限定在保障公共利益所必需的适度范围之内。我国现行法律对于当场盘查和继续盘问的条件及程序规定较为粗疏,还存在证明标准不明确、重要盘查类型未予列举,盘查救济途径不通畅等问题。由于权力行使界限不明,盘查权缺乏法律依据,进而造成人权保障缺乏防护。而完善盘查法制不仅使警察盘查权行使具有正当性,能够和谐警民关系,并能有效制约权力,保障权利和自由。The police power of interrogation and examination influences the basic rights and freedom of the citizens, and it should be limited to the appropriate area which to protect public interests. The current laws and rules of our country are not integrated deeply enough estimation on the conditions and procedures of interrogation and examination,there are still some problems, such as unclear standard proof, could not enumerate the important types of interrogation and examination, relief ways of interrogation and examination are not smooth and so on. Because of the unclear boundaries of power exercise, the power of interrogation and examination lacks legal basis, which leads to the lack of protection in human rights. Perfecting the legal system of interrogation and examination not only makes the police power of interrogation and examination to be legitimate, harmonious relationship between the police and the people, but also restrict the power effectively, and protect the rights and freedoms.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.145.38