“禁止篡夺公司机会”实证分析  

Empirical Analysis of Prohibition on Usurping Corporate Opportunities in China

作　　者：黄倩倩 HUANG Qianqian(Law of school,Beijing Institute of Technology,Beijing 100081,China)

机构地区：[1]北京理工大学法学院,北京100081

出　　处：《河北工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2018年第2期59-64,共6页Journal of Hebei University of Technology：Social Sciences Edition

摘　　要：以禁止篡夺公司机会相关裁判文书为研究对象,通过实证分析发现:宏观上,相关案件数量有上升趋势且案件多分布于经济发达地区、涉案公司几乎均为有限责任公司、案件的胜败诉率基本持平。微观层面而言,立法上竞业禁止义务与禁止篡夺公司机会的暧昧关系影响了实务对后者的认定;具体在认定公司机会时,法院会考量第三人意愿与公司意愿、经营范围、公司能力、公司付出实质努力及公平原则等因素;而对篡夺行为中的利用职务便利,则通过获取商业机会的时间、是否利用公司资源等因素来判定。This paper has studied written judgments related to prohibition on usurping corporate opportunities via empirical analysis. The paper has found that the number of related cases in developed areas tends to increase,and corporations involved are almost limited liability companies whose winning rate is basically equal to the losing rate.However,on legislation,the ambiguous relationship between prohibition of business strife and prohibition of usurping corporate opportunities has exerted influence on the judicial judging of the latter. When it comes to the existence of corporate opportunities,several factors,including willingness of the third party and the corporation,business scope,the corporation＇s capability,substantial efforts and fairness,tend to be considered in judicial practice. As for cognizance of taking advantage of the position in usurpation,it is checked through whether its staff have acquired business opportunities at an improper time and whether they have utilized the corporation＇s resources to achieve their goal.

关 键 词：公司机会 裁判文书 实证分析 

分 类 号：D922.291.91[政治法律—经济法学]