检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张亚宁[1] 徐明[2] 董颖[1] 艾尚友 吴喜军[1] ZHANG Ya-ning;XV Ming;DONG Ying;AI Shang-you;WU Yi-jun(Water Distribution and Pollution Control Research Center,Yulin University,Shaanxi Yulin 719000,China;Xi'an Municipal Engineering Design & Research Institute Co.,Ltd.,Shaanxi Xi'an 710068,China;Yulin High-tech Industrial Park Water Supply and Drainage Company,Shaanxi Yulin 719000,China)
机构地区:[1]榆林学院榆林学院输配水及水污染控制研究中心,陕西榆林719000 [2]西安市政设计研究院有限公司,陕西西安710068 [3]榆林高新区供排水有限责任公司,陕西榆林719000
出 处:《当代化工》2018年第8期1617-1621,共5页Contemporary Chemical Industry
基 金:陕西省自然科学基金资助项目(No.2011JM5004);西北旱区生态水利工程国家重点实验室培育基地开放研究基金资助(No.2013KFKT-3)
摘 要:土壤重金属污染问题日趋严重,乙二胺四乙酸二钠(EDTA)和柠檬酸对土壤中重金属的淋洗去除效果明显。以某电镀厂的重金属污染土壤为研究对象,对比分析复配淋洗对重金属的去除效果。在25℃,p H=3.0,振荡淋洗时间为12 h,液固比为20的试验条件下,通过批量振荡淋洗试验,对比了不同浓度的EDTA和柠檬酸各自对重金属的去除效果,并将最佳浓度的EDTA和柠檬酸按照一定的体积比进行复配,探究其最佳复配比例,分析了在最佳洗涤条件下重金属形态变化。研究结果表明,采用0.1 mol/L的EDTA与0.3 mol/L的柠檬酸按1:3的体积比复配而成的淋洗剂对重金属的整体去除效果最好,且优于单一淋洗剂的去除效果,对Cu、Cr、Ni、Zn、Pb的去除率分别为79.1%、53.8%、53.9%、82.6%、78.7%。形态分析结果表明,复配淋洗对各形态的重金属均有较好的去除效果,对重金属全量去除贡献最大的为残渣态,并得出了淋洗后各形态的分布比例,为进行土壤环境风险评价提供依据。The pollution of heavy metals becomes more and more serious in soil, and the effect of EDTA and citric acid on the leaching of heavy metals in soil is obvious. In this study, the heavy metal contaminated soil in an electroplating plant was taken as the research object, and the removal effect of heavy metal by compound leaching was compared and analyzed. When the temperature was 25 ℃, p H = 3.0, the oscillation leaching time was 12 h,and the liquid-solid ratio was 20, the removal effects of heavy metals by using different concentrations of EDTA and CA were compared to explore the optimal proportion by batch oscillating leaching tests, and the change of chemical forms of heavy metals under the best washing conditions was analyzed. The results showed that the eluent prepared from 0.1 mol/L EDTA and 0.3 mol/L CA(1:3) had the best effect on the overall removal of heavy metals, that was better than the single spray lotion, and the removal rates of Cu, Cr, Ni, Zn, Pb were 79.1%, 53.8%, 53.9%, 82.6%. 78.7%,respectively.Morphological analysis showed that compound leaching had the better effect for removing heavy metals, the largest contribution was residue state, and the proportion of speciation after leaching was obtained, which could provide the basis for soil environmental risk assessment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117