腋窝入路两种切口方法假体隆乳术的临床效果  

Comparison of incisions between two approaches in transaxillary breast augmentation

作　　者：胡艺觉 肖征刚 Hu Yijue;Xiao Zhenggang(Department of Plastic Surgery,Yamei Medical Cosmetology Hospital,Changsha 410000,China)

机构地区：[1]湖南省长沙市雅美医疗美容医院美容外科,410000

出　　处：《中华医学美学美容杂志》2018年第4期245-247,共3页Chinese Journal of Medical Aesthetics and Cosmetology

摘　　要：目的比较腋窝入路两种切口方法假体隆乳术的临床效果。方法对60例女性美容就医者行腋窝切口圆盘形假体胸大肌后隆乳术。随机分为2组，A组30例使用冠状切口；B组30例使用矢状切口。比较2组假体植入操作时间、瘢痕程度和瘢痕修复率的差异。结果A组假体植入所需平均时间为（14．55±3．79）S，B组假体植入所需平均时间为（27.38±6．79）S，差异有统计学意义（t=9．03，P〈0．05）。瘢痕程度的差异无统计学意义（X2=0．26，P〉0．05），瘢痕修复率的差异无统计学意义（X2=0．35，P〉0．05）。结论与矢状切El相比，冠状切口能缩短假体植入操作时间。Objective To compare the coronary incision with the sagittal incision in transaxillary breast augmentation. Methods A total of 60 patients who underwent transaxillary subpectoral breast augmentation with round breast implants were randomly allocated into two groups： Group A （30 patients） received coronary incision, while Group B received sagittal incision. The operative time of implant insertion, the distinction of scar and the repair rate of scar were compared between the two groups. Results The mean operative time of implant insertion in group A was （14.55±3.79）s, and that in group B was （27.38±6.79） s, with statistically significant difference （t = 9.03, P〈0.05）. But there was no statistical significance in the difference in the degree of scar （X2 =0.26, P〉0.05） or the repair rate of scar （X2=0.35, P〉0.05） between two groups. Conclusions As for the operative time of implant insertion, the coronary incision is better than the sagittal incision.

关 键 词：腋窝入路 冠状切口 矢状切口 隆乳术 假体植入 操作时间 

分 类 号：R655.8[医药卫生—外科学]