检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王紫馨[1] 张文文 张雪婷 李晨[1] 王紫玉 杨伶娜 Wang Zixin;Zhang Wenwen;Zhang Xueting;Li Chen;Wang Ziyu;Yang Lingna(Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine,Beijing Hospital,National Center of Gerontology,Beijing 100730,China)
机构地区:[1]北京医院国家老年医学中心呼吸与危重症医学科,100730
出 处:《国际呼吸杂志》2018年第15期1163-1165,共3页International Journal of Respiration
摘 要:目的 编制适合我国成人住院患者的雾化治疗知识问卷并验证其信度与效度,为实施针对性的宣教干预方案、提高患者雾化吸入依从性提供依据.方法 根据我国雾化吸入现状并结合中外文献,编制了包含30个题目的住院患者雾化治疗知识问卷,在50例(年龄20~89岁)样本中检测问卷信度,由5名专家共同评价问卷的内容效度.结果 问卷的半分信度为0.747,Cronbach α系数为0.744,问卷内容效度指数为0.98,题目内容效度指数为0.8~1.0,结构效度值为0.706,信度和效度指标均较高.结论 成人住院患者雾化治疗知识问卷信度和效度指标较好,可为实施针对性的宣教干预方案提供有效的评估工具.Objective To provide the basis for implementing the targeted education intervention programs and improving the patient compliance of atomization inhalation by developing the atomization knowledge questionnaire for adult inpatient and verifying its reliability and validity.Methods A atomization knowledge questionnaire for adult inpatient containing 30 items was developed on the basis of atomization current situation among Chinese patients and literatures at home and aboard.The reliability of the questionnaire was examined in 50 samples (aged 20 89 years old),and the content validity of the questionnaire was evaluated by five experts.Results The split-half reliability coefficient was 0.747,Cronbach α coefficient was 0.744,the content validity was 0.98,the item validity was 0.8-1.0,the structural validity was 0.706.Both reliability and validity were high.Conclusions The reliability and validity of the atomization knowledge questionnaire for adult inpatient were good.It can provide effective assessment tools for implementing the targeted intervention programs.
分 类 号:R193[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229