检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李理[1] Li Li
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院近代史研究所
出 处:《中国社会科学院研究生院学报》2018年第4期135-144,共10页Journal of Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
基 金:2016年国家社会科学基金项目"近代日本对南海诸岛的非法侵占及战后中国的接收研究"(16BZS069)的阶段性成果
摘 要:在台湾当局撤守西沙、南沙后,菲律宾觊觎南沙促使台湾当局重返南沙。1956年台湾当局重返南沙并驻防太平岛时,美国并不支持台湾当局的"主权说",认为台湾当局没有能力防卫整个南海诸岛,故美国的南海政策开始出现对海峡两岸极为不利的变化,提出台湾当局应当联合共同阵营的菲律宾、越南,让他们占据地缘接近的岛屿,以防止中华人民共和国占领西沙、南沙群岛,形成"模糊处理主权不能有利于中华人民共和国"的南海政策。After the Taiwan authorities withdrew from Xisha and Nansha Islands, the Philippines' desire for Nansha Islands prompted the Taiwan authorities to return to them. When the Taiwan authorities garrisoned again in Taiping Island in 1956, the United States did not support Taiwan authorities' claim of "sovereignty" on it, because the United States believed that the Taiwan authorities did not have the ability to defend the entire South China Sea Islands. Therefore, the U. S. policy towards South China Sea began to show extremely adverse changes for both sides of the Taiwan Straits. It proposed that the Taiwan authorities should unite with the Philippines and Vietnam in the common camp to allow them to occupy islands close to each other in order to prevent the People's Republic of China from occupying Xisha and Nansha Islands, and thus forming a South China Sea policy that claimed "blurred sovereignty cannot be beneficial to the People's Republic of China" .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30