中文版疾病接受度量表的信效度评价  

Evaluation of reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Acceptance Illness Scale

作　　者：赵雯雯 Zhao Wenwen(Ward 6,Neurology Department,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University,Harbin 150081,China)

机构地区：[1]哈尔滨医科大学附属第二医院神经内科六病房,哈尔滨150081

出　　处：《中华现代护理杂志》2018年第22期2652-2655,共4页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing

摘　　要：目的 评价中文版疾病接受度量表（AIS-CHI）的信效度.方法 将AIS进行翻译、回译、文化调试,形成中文版AIS-CHI.采用便利抽样的方法,选取2016年10月—2017年3月于哈尔滨医科大学附属第二医院神经内科住院的首发脑卒中患者89例进行问卷调查,分析其信效度.结果 AIS-CHI总内容效度指数（S-CVI）为0.925,AIS-CHI各条目得分与总分呈正相关（P〈0.05）.AIS-CHI的KMO值为0.611,Bartlett球形检验值为167.992（P〈0.001）,经探索性因子分析得到3个公因子,累积解释变异量为64.36%.AIS-CHI内部一致性Cronbach＇s α系数为0.754.结论 中文版AIS具有良好的信效度,可用来评估患者疾病接受的程度.Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version Acceptance of Illness Scale （AIS-CHI）. Methods By translation, back-translation, culture debugging of the original version of AIS, the AIS-CHI was acquired. From October 2016 to March 2017, we conducted questionnaire survey on 89 patients with initial stroke in the neurological department of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University selected by convenience sampling method to evaluate the reliability and validity. Results The scale-level content validity index （S-CVI） of the AIS-CHI was 0.925. Item-to-total correlation analysis shows that each item scores was positively correlated with total score （P 〈 0.05）. The KMO value was 0.611, while the spherical test value of Bartlett was 167.992 （P 〈 0.001）. 3 common factors from exploratory factor analysis explained cumulatively 64.36% of variance. The internal consistency Cronbaeh＇s ot of AIS-CHI was 0.754. Conclusions AIS-CHI has good reliability and validity, and it can be used to assess the patient＇s acceptance of disease.

关 键 词：卒中 疾病接受度量表 信度 效度 

分 类 号：R473.74[医药卫生—护理学]