检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王建学[1] Wang Jianxue
出 处:《政治与法律》2018年第9期68-79,共12页Political Science and Law
基 金:2017年度国家社科基金重大项目"中国宪法学文献整理与研究"(项目编号:17ZDA125)的阶段性成果;中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(项目编号:20720171011)资助
摘 要:生态文明入宪具有重大时代意义。这种意义的准确阐释不能割裂宪法环境条款的整体变迁,只有借助历史解释方法才能真正理解环境、发展与人权的关系。从内容上看,生态国策、环境人权和国家环保义务构成三位一体的环境规范整体,宜采用体系解释方法实现三者的价值贯通与功能互补,由此,生态文明条款自身的效力与实施也得以强化。有必要探索宪法环境条款的释义学并构建环境宪法,填补环境立法的价值真空并实现环境法的内容统合。目前宪法环境条款主要通过立法得到实施,环境法的立法和解释应充分体现宪法价值,尤其是对环境人权的尊重和保障。The incorporation of ecological civilization into the constitution has great era significance. In order to make accurate interpretation of this significance, the holistic evolution of constitutional environmental clauses cannot be cut apart. The relationship among environment, development and human right could only be really understood through historical interpretation. From the perspective of the content, the ecological polity, environmental human right and the state' s duty to protect environment consist a three-in-one bloc of environmental norms, so it is suitable to adopt the systematic interpretation to realize their value sharing and functional complementation, thus strengthening the effectiveness and enforcement of clauses on ecological civilization themselves. It' s necessary to explore the hermeneutics of constitutional environmental clauses and establish environmental constitutional law, make up the value gap of environmental legislation and realize the content unification of environmental laws. At present, constitutional environmental clauses are mainly implemented through legislation, therefore, the legislation and interpretation of environmental law should fully show constitutional values, especially the respect and guarantee of environmental human rights.
分 类 号:D921[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222