检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孟庆龙[1] Meng Qinglong
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院世界历史研究所
出 处:《学术前沿》2018年第15期24-35,共12页Frontiers
基 金:国家社科基金重大项目"中英美印俄五国有关中印边界问题解密档案文献整理与研究[1950~1965]"的阶段性成果;项目批准号:12&ZD189;社科院创新工程项目"中印边界问题档案文献资料整理与研究"的研究成果
摘 要:印太战略目前还是一个正在发展的概念。美国和印度作为印太战略框架内最重要的两大政治体,两国关系的历史基础、现状及未来发展的不确定性,将在很大程度上决定印太战略的地缘格局演变。由于美印之间一直缺乏平等和尊重,存在差异和分歧,再加上中印关系和中美关系的影响,以及"印太"区域内国家的态度等因素,目前印度尚未显出在印太战略上与美国携手或相向而行的迹象,印太战略也远非凝聚美、印、日、澳四国共识的基本定型的"战略"。在可预见的将来,印太战略还会是美国主唱、结局难料的一个戏码。The Indo-Pacific strategy is still a developing concept. As the United States and India are the two most important political players within the Indo-Pacific strategic framework, the historical basis, current situation and uncertain future development of their relationship will largely determine the evolution of the geopolitical pattern under the Indo-Pacific strategy Due to the lack of equality and mutual respect and the differences between them, and coupled with the influence of Sino-India relations and Sino-US relations and the attitudes of other countries in the Indo-Pacific region, there has not been any sign that India will join hands or share the same goal with the United States in terms of the Indo-Pacifxc strategy, and this strategy is still far from a full-fledged "strategy" built on the basis of consensus among the United States, India, Japan and Australia. In the foreseeable future, the United States will continue to play a main role in the Indo-Pacific strategy with uncertainties.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249