检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李鑫鑫[1] 季红娟 LI Xin-xin;JI Hong-jun(Hospital Affiliated to Nantong University,Nantong 226001,Jiangsu)
出 处:《安徽卫生职业技术学院学报》2018年第4期73-74,共2页Journal of Anhui Health Vocational & Technical College
摘 要:目的:探讨系统性护理干预在脑卒中吞咽障碍患者中的应用效果。方法:将医院收治的脑卒中吞咽障碍患者112例作为研究对象,根据护理方法差异分为研究组(56例)及对照组(56例)。对照组采取常规护理,研究组实施系统性护理干预,对比两组患者护理干预效果。结果:干预后,两组患者洼田氏饮水试验评分均有所下降,但研究组水平低于对照组(P<0.05);研究组并发症发生率(7.14%)低于对照组(23.21%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:脑卒中吞咽障碍治疗过程中实施系统性护理干预可促进吞咽功能恢复,起到辅助治疗作用,并降低并发症发生率。Objective:To explore the application effect of systematic nursing intervention in patients with dysphagia after stroke. Methods:112 patients with dysphagia after stroke in hospital were selected as the research subjects. According to the difference of nursing methods, they were divided into study group(56 cases) and control group(56 cases). The control group received routine nursing, and the study group received systematic nursing intervention. The effect of nursing intervention was compared between the two groups. Results:After the intervention, two groups of patients with Watian drinking water test scores decreased, but the level of study group is lower than the control group(P〈0.05), and the incidence of complications in the study group(7.14%) was lower than that in the control group(23.21%), and the two groups were significantly different(P〈0.05). Conclusion:Systematic nursing intervention can promote swallowing function in stroke patients with dysphagia., play the role of adjuvant therapy, and reduce the incidence of adverse events.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.4