检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:董远溪 DONG Yuan-xi(Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学,北京100872
出 处:《中小企业管理与科技》2018年第26期107-108,共2页Management & Technology of SME
摘 要:2009年6月美国最高法院再审"Bilski案",宣布由State Street案确立的"具体、实用、有形"测试法不再作为商业方法专利的判断标准,同时也否定了"机器或转换"测试法作为商业方法专利审查的唯一标准。论文分析总结该案脉络,并讨论该案对我国商业方法专利的审查标准制定带来的启示。In June 2009, the US Supreme Court re-examined the "Bilski Case", and announced that the "useful,concrete,tangible" test method established by the State Street case was no longer a criterion for determining business method patent, meanwhile, it also denied the "machine or conversion" test method as the sole standard for patent review of business methods. The paper analyzes and summarizes the context of the case, and discusses the implications of this case for the establishment of the standards for the examination of business method patents in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.26