检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]兰州大学草地农业科技学院甘肃省草原生态研究所,兰州730020 [2]甘肃省动物营养研究所,兰州730030
出 处:《草业学报》2002年第3期8-13,共6页Acta Prataculturae Sinica
基 金:国家自然科学基金重点项目(39630250);甘肃省科委"九五"攻关(K971-2-34A);国家重点基础研究发展规划(G2000018602)资助
摘 要:盆栽条件下利用添加系列设计对箭舌豌豆(ViciasativaCV.333/A),黄花草木樨(Melilotsofficinalis),牛尾草(Festucaelatior)和长穗偃麦草(Elytrigiaelongata)个体的种间关系和种间竞争力进行了测定。结果表明:81.3%的目标种单株生物量潜势Pmax与邻居种密度显著负相关,56.3%的目标种单株生物量潜势Pmax与邻居种生物量呈显著负相关(P<0.05),邻居种密度平均可解释74.9%的目标种生物量变异。4个种的竞争效应和竞争反应对邻居种敏感,它们的等级无显著的协同性(P>0.05)。1年生豆科牧草箭舌豌豆的竞争效应和竞争反应均占首位,生长当年与多年生牧草混播有生长优势;草木樨和长穗偃麦草的竞争反应较大,生长后期生长优势明显。<Abstrcat> In a pot experiment, an additive design was used to determine the competittive ability and interspecific competition relationship among four forage species: Vicia sativa Var. 333/A, Melilots officinalis, Festuca elatior and Elytrigia elnogata. The results indicated that significantly negative linear regression of individual target biomass potential was 81.3% on neighbour density and 56.0% on neighbour biomass. Proportion of variance in target biomass explained by neighbour density and biomass was 74.3% and 63.0% respectively (P<0.05). Interspecific competition relationship was revealed between species species combination. The hierarchies of competitive effect and response were not concordant among target species or among neighbour species, which meant each species was sensitive to neighbour one. As the best competitor species, V. sativa could occupy the resource in early stage, while the weaker competitors, E. elongata, M. officinalis use resource better in later stage.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49