追赶智慧城市潮流：我们是否已迷失方向  

The Smart City Bandwagon: Have We Lost our Way?

作　　者：Kevin C.Desouza Kendra L.Smith 王奎明[4] 

机构地区：[1]澳大利亚昆士兰科技大学商学院管理系 [2]美国布鲁金斯学会 [3]美国斯坦福大学人口健康科学中心 [4]上海交通大学中国城市治理研究院

出　　处：《探索与争鸣》2018年第8期4-10,15,共8页Exploration and Free Views

摘　　要：世界各地的城市都在投入大量资源将其自身转变为更富智慧的实体。毫无疑问各个城市付出的努力很宝贵也很重要,但是我们却对这些投入的演变感到不安。我们经常发现这些投入大量集中在技术和数据等方面,却很少去关注社会、经济和公民因素这些方面。我们认为,需要重新建构有关智慧城市的对话。在过去几年中,全球很多城市变得更加脆弱:基础设施、经济、社会、政治和公民因素都在影响城市的脆弱度。我们需要思考如何合理利用技术帮助民众解决问题,比如解决维护和加强社会契约、负责任地实施技术方案、设计城市治理框架等问题。只有这样才能体现每个个体的多样性、利益、抱负和价值,使社区变得宜居、公正、可持续发展和有适应力。Cities around the world are investing significant resources to transform themselves into smarter entities.While there is no doubt that these efforts are important and valuable, we are troubled with how these efforts have evolved. we often see efforts that focus predominantly on the technical and data elements of the equation,without much care toward how they affect the social,economic,and civic elements. In on our recent research, we will argue that the dominant conversation surrounding smart cities should be reframed. Cities across the globe have become more fragile over the last few years. Infrastructure, economic, social, political, and civic elements affect the level of fragility in a city. We need to focus our conversation on how we can use technology for social good to address issues such as a preserving and strengthening the social compact,implementing technical solutions responsibly, and designing governance frameworks to account for diversity of entities and their interests, aspirations,and values. We will outline best practices to reflect on your work toward making your community livable,just,sustainable,and resilient.

关 键 词：智慧城市 脆弱城市 城市技术 适应力 复杂系统 设计 城市创新 

分 类 号：F299.1[经济管理—国民经济]