反恐行政认定行为的不可诉性商榷  

On the Non-justiciability of Anti-Terrorism Administrative Confirmation

作　　者：戚建刚[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学

出　　处：《中外法学》2018年第4期976-991,共16页Peking University Law Journal

基　　金：本文获得国家社科基金2017年度重点课题“环境风险治理工具的行政法进路研究”(项目编号：17AAFX013)的资助.

摘　　要：《中华人民共和国反恐怖主义法》将国家反恐怖主义工作领导机构做出的反恐行政认定行为规定为不可诉行为的做法值得商榷。从行为性质来分析,反恐行政认定行为不属于国家行为,也不符合终局行政裁决行为的法律特征,而是一种影响被认定的恐怖活动组织和人员的权利或义务的行政确认行为,理应具有可诉性。将反恐行政认定行为规定为不可诉行为与诸多域外奉行反恐行政认定模式国家的立(司)法例相背,也不符合该项制度的现实与未来发展趋势之所需。立法者应当适时修改《反恐怖主义法》相关条款,将反恐行政认定行为纳入司法审查范围,作为可诉行为来对待。The Anti-terrorism Law of the People＇s Republic of China stipulates that the anti-ter rorism administrative confirmation made by the anti-terrorist agencies is non-justiciable. However, the anti-terrorism administrative confirmation is neither a state action nor a final administrative adjudi cation. In fact, the anti-terrorism administrative confirmation is a administrative action that can influ ence the rights and obligations of the recognized terrorist organizations and personnel and it should be jus ticiable. The Chinese law that defines the anti-terrorism administrative confirmation as non is different from many countries around the world and it does not conform to the reality and the velopment of this tion shall be brou sys ght tem. Therefore it should be revised and the anti-terrorism administrative under judicial review. justiciable future de-confirma-tion shall be brought under judicial review.

关 键 词：《反恐怖主义法》 反恐行政认定 不可诉性 

分 类 号：D922.14[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]