我国网络盗窃犯罪的刑法规制  

Research on the Criminal Regulations of Cyber Theft in China

作　　者：张爱艳[1,2] 何峰[1,3] Zhang Aiyan;He Feng

机构地区：[1]山东政法学院 [2]山东政法学院山东省高校证据鉴识重点实验室 [3]烟台市牟平区文化街道办事处

出　　处：《刑法论丛》2017年第2期87-119,共33页Criminal Law Review

摘　　要：我国网络盗窃犯罪的刑法规制存在虚拟财产立法保护滞后、刑法适用模糊、刑罚设置片面等问题,司法上亦存在行为定性之争、数额认定不一以及既遂判定相异等问题。主张重新审视刑法谦抑理念,强调刑法的处罚范围既不是＂越窄越好＂也不是＂无限扩张＂,而是根据国民的预测可能性确定＂妥当的处罚范围＂。通过立法解释明确虚拟财产的财产属性,司法解释进一步明确帮助信息网络活动罪的适用。网络盗窃行为构成犯罪的以盗窃罪定性,以提现说作为既遂的判定标准,以被盗财物的价值认定盗窃数额。从而在立法上消除漏洞、严密法网;司法上统一标准、指导司法。Under the circumstance that cyber theft is becoming more and more serious, but the current legislation and judicature can not regulate cyber theft effectively. This paper will take the criminal regulations of cyber theft as the research object. It suggests that ultima ratio of penalty should be reevaluated. It proposes that the scope of criminal punishment is neither ＂as narrow as possible＂ nor ＂ infinite expansion＂, it should be ＂proper＂, which is not beyond the predictive scope of the citizen. From the legislative aspect, it points out the application of criminal law should be based on the principle. From the judicial aspect, It states some criminal judicature suggestions on regulating cyber theft on the condition that not violating the principle of untima ratio of penalty. It holds the view that cyber theft should be sentenced to theft. Whether the actor got the money shall be the standard on the determination of completion of theft. At last, it points out that the amount of theft is determined by the value of the stolen property. Then eliminate legislative loopholes and perfect the legislature on the legislative aspect. Uniform standards and guide the judicial organs to adjudicate cases on the judicial aspect.

关 键 词：网络盗窃 虚拟财产 刑法谦抑 刑法规制 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]