知识产权人拒绝许可的反垄断法分析  

Analysis of Antitrust Law on Refusal of Intellectual Property

作　　者：张添舒 ZHANG Tian-shu(School of Law,Nankai University,Tianjin 300350,China)

机构地区：[1]南开大学法学院,天津300350

出　　处：《广西政法管理干部学院学报》2018年第4期87-93,共7页Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law

摘　　要：拒绝许可是知识产权法赋予知识产权人的权利,但是当其产生排斥、限制竞争的效果,损害消费者利益时,又会被反垄断法所调整。美国采用关键设施理论和主观意图理论规制拒绝许可行为,欧盟在关键设施理论的基础上通过微软案丰富和发展了知识产权人拒绝许可行为的反垄断法分析要件。基于此,我国对知识产权人拒绝许可行为规制应主要从四个要件进行考察:首先,当事人在上游市场拥有支配地位;其次,其拒绝许可行为有可能在下游市场消除有效竞争,为其带来支配地位;再次,拒绝许可阻碍了具有消费者需求的"新产品"产生;最后,这一拒绝没有合理理由。Refhsal of intellectual property is lawful on the intellectual property law. When the refusal of intellectual property behavior eliminates or restricts the competition, and damages the interest of consumers, it is prohibited by the antitrust law. The United States adopts essential facility doctrine and subjective motivation theory to solve refusal of deal. The practices of the EU absorbed the essential facility theory in refusing permits and enriched and developed relevant inspection standards in later Microsoft case. Thus, refusal of intellectual property should be solved from four conditions：firstly, the party has a dominant position on the upstream market; secondly, there is the possibility that the refusal will lead to another dominant position in the downstream market; thirdly, the refusal to deal prevents the emergence of a new product with consumer demands; finally, there isn＇t a reasonable justification for this behavior.

关 键 词：知识产权 拒绝交易 反垄断法 

分 类 号：DF523.9[政治法律—民商法学]