科学优先权:门户之见、投稿策略、保密与营销  

Who invented optogenetics and how the scientists handle priority

作　　者：沈楠[1,2] 徐飞[1] SHEN Nan;XU Fei(Department of Philosophy of Sciences and Technologies,University of Science and Technology of China,Hefei 230026,China;School of Foreign Languages,Anhui Agricultural University,Hefei 230036,China)

机构地区：[1]中国科学技术大学科技哲学部,安徽合肥230026 [2]安徽农业大学外国语学院,安徽合肥230036

出　　处：《科学学研究》2018年第9期1550-1556,共7页Studies in Science of Science

基　　金：国家自然科学基金资助项目(71874170)

摘　　要：本文介绍了美国华裔科学家潘卓华与卡尔·戴瑟罗斯和爱德华·博伊登之间关于光遗传学发明人的著名争议，由此剖析了其中折射出的学术期刊在审稿时的“误差判断”、学术从业者的“投稿策略”，以及学术成果的“保密”和“营销”手段等问题，进而提出学术界应当尽量祛除隐藏在众多学术争议背后的利益根源，回归传统的默顿规范。This paper is intended to introduce the famous dispute among the American biologists Zhuohua Pan,Karl Deisseroth and Edward Boyden,and further analyze the＂inaccurate judgment＂,＂submission strategy＂of academic papers,and the matter of keeping academic secrets and propaganda. The final conclusion is that the academia is supposed to make strong attempts to get rid of the matter of personal interest which lies behind various academic disputes,and return to the traditional ＂Merton Complementarity＂.

关 键 词：光遗传学 判断误差 投稿策略 学术保密 学术营销 

分 类 号：G301[文化科学]