检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘桂兰[1] 孙娟[1] 余嘉[1] Liu Guilan;Sun Juan;Yu Jia(Guangdong Techno-economy Research & Development Center,Guagnzhou 510070,China)
机构地区:[1]广东省技术经济研究发展中心,广东广州510070
出 处:《未来与发展》2018年第9期32-37,共6页Future and Development
摘 要:公共基础设施是衡量城市发展水平的重要标志。在政府基础设施建设快速发展的同时,国内外发展形成了不同类型的融资模式。我国随着城镇化进程的加快,基础设施建设投入大幅增加,财政投资、土地储备已不足以支付。近年来,政府在基础设施建设融资方面,除了证券市场、国内外银团贷款,还引进了社会资本,以PPP、BT、股权基金、ABS等多种形式筹集资金。本文以Z市的交通建设为例,通过分析该市目前交通建设情况、融资现状及存在的困难,给出适合该市的两组融资模式建议,并与传统的以地建路模式做对比,分析三种模式的利与弊。Public infrastructure is an important symbol to measure the level of urban development. At the same time of rapid development of infrastructure construction in the government, different types of financing modes have been formed at home and abroad. On the basis of traditional financial investment, land reserve system financing, domestic and foreign loans and securities market financing, China's infrastructure construction joins the social capital Input, to PPP, BOT, equity funds and other forms of raising funds. This paper takes traffic construction in Z City as an example. By analyzing the current traffic construction situation, financing status quo and existing difficulties in the city, this paper gives two suggestions for financing mode of the city. Compared with the traditional construction mode, Analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of the three models.
分 类 号:G642[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3