检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邱静[1]
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学国际关系学院
出 处:《政治思想史》2018年第3期152-170,共19页Journal of the History of Political Thought
摘 要:曼斯菲尔德对"男性气概"的定义具有两重性。他正确地指出了"性别中立社会"存在的问题,但并未能指出问题到底在哪里,也未能提供真正的答案。将女性主义视为虚无主义仍是一种从男性视角出发的解读,男性气概的缺失实际并非女性主义兴起的结果,而正是女性主义兴起的原因。另外,曼斯菲尔德从一个侧面接近了性别关系的研究方式,但针对现代社会的问题,仅靠划分公共领域和私人领域是不够的,人们(不论是男性还是女性)有必要从性别关系而不是性别主义的视角出发进行研究。Professor Mansfield's definition of" manliness" has two aspects. He is right that there are problems in contemporary gender-neutral society,but he fails to identify the causes or provide the solutions. The claim that feminism is nihilism is still an interpretation from the male perspective. The decadence of manliness is not the result of the burgeoning of feminism,but the cause of it. On the other hand,Mansfield shows( probably involuntarily) a perspective of" gender relation". However,it is not enough to resolve gender problems simply by readopting the distinction of public and private as Mansfield suggests. People( both male and female) should continue to study and practice from the perspective of gender relation rather than sexism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145