得与失:外国法查明责任分配之困  

Gains and Losses:Dilemma of the Distribution of the Responsibility of Ascertainment of Foreign Law

作　　者：刘艳娜[1] LIU Yan-na(College of Humanties and Law,Yanshan University,Qinhuangdao 066004 China)

机构地区：[1]燕山大学文法学院,河北秦皇岛066004

出　　处：《河北法学》2018年第9期117-130,共14页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：河北省社科基金<国际民事诉讼视野下的管制权力法治化研究>(HB16FX030)的阶段性成果;燕山大学青年基金<经济法域外性问题的理论演进与策略选择>(15SKA004)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：我国关于外国法查明责任分配的法律条文已经比较完善,但相关判例表明我国查明外国法的成功率仍然很低。在法官承担查明责任的情况下,我国存在法官使用的查明途径过窄、过度依赖当事人、对于一审法院查明失败的案件二审法院缺少补充查明等问题;在当事人承担查明责任的情况下,我国主要存在当事人选择外国法之后消极证明外国法、当事人承担过高的外国法证明标准等问题。我们应当从约束法官的自由裁量权和保障当事人的选法权利以及完善相关的配套措施等方面保障外国法查明的效果。Legal rules about ascertainment of foreign law in China have been perfect.But related cases indicate that there are still many problems in the practice of ascertainment of foreign law in our country.When the judges take the responsibility,there are problems such as ：the ways judges use are too limited,judges depend on the parties excessively,the courts of second instance are not keen on supplementary ascertainment when the court of first instance failed.When the parties take the responsibility,there are problems such as ：the parties always don＇t prove foreign law positively after they have made their choice and the standard of proof of foreign law is too high,etc.We should fix it in three aspects：limit the discretion of judges,ensure the rights of choice of law of the parties and perfect the related supporting measures.

关 键 词：外国法 查明主体 责任分配 选法权利的保障 自由裁量权的限制 

分 类 号：DF971[政治法律—国际法学]