视频聚合盗链行为法律性质的再探讨  

Discussion on the Legal Nature of Conduct of Aggregated Hotlinking

作　　者：孙那 SUN Na(Northwest University of Political Science and Law,xi＇an Shanxi 710122,China)

机构地区：[1]西北政法大学经济法学院,陕西西安710122

出　　处：《法学论坛》2018年第5期103-111,共9页Legal Forum

基　　金：国家社科基金2017重点项目"知识产权国际保护趋势与中国对策研究"(17AFX024)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：目前司法界和学界对于聚合盗链行为的界定存在分歧,类似案件在不同的司法机关存在不同的裁判结果。正确理解视频聚合盗链行为的前提是正确理解聚合盗链背后的技术实现过程和原理,聚合盗链不等于破坏技术保护措施加深层链接行为的简单叠加。此外,通过美国相关判例的比较研究和对国际条约规定的解读,我国的信息网络传播权的内容随着技术不断的发展,其内涵和外延也应做出相应的调整,信息网络传播权规制的提供作品的行为不仅包括初始的上传行为,还应涵盖在网络环境中的后续传播行为,以确保权利人可以有效控制作品的传播,这也是著作权法从传统的以复制权为核心的规制路径向以传播权为核心的规范路径的必然要求。Judicial circles and academic circles have different opinions on how to define aggregated hotlinking at present, similar cases get various judgements among different judicial authorities.Understanding the process and theory of the techcological realization behind aggregated hotlinking is the premise of understanding the conduct of video aggregated hotlinking accurately, aggregated hotlinking is not equal to removing technology-protection measures plus deep-linking. Furthermore, as with the development of tecMology, the connotation and denotation of the right of communication through information network （RCIN） in our Country should be adjust accordingly throngh the comparative study of related cases in US and the interpretation of international agreements , that the conduct of providing works regulated by RCIN should not only includes initial uploading but also includes the following transmis- sion in network in order to guarantee obligee can control the transmission of the work effectively. It is also the necessity that the reg- ulation of copyright law should switches from traditional copyright-centered to right of communication-centered.

关 键 词：聚合盗链 侵权责任 服务器标准 信息网络传播权 

分 类 号：D923.4[政治法律—民商法学]