恐怖主义犯罪立法中的行为无价值与正当性  

Handlungsunwert and Legitimacy of Terrorism Crime Legislation

作　　者：王耀忠[1] 

机构地区：[1]西北政法大学刑事法学院,陕西西安710063

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2018年第5期64-80,共17页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：陕西省教育厅人文社科基地重点科研计划项目(15JZ084)"暴力恐怖犯罪的成因与对策研究"

摘　　要：恐怖主义犯罪立法中的预备犯、举动犯、持有犯等体现了现代风险社会刑法的活性化、法益保护早期化与反恐法网的严密化,立法理念逐渐由结果无价值向行为无价值转变。重视规范机能和积极的一般预防的行为无价值在其视角转向行为背后的重大法益时取得了正当性的依据,其比结果无价值更具有生命力。恐怖主义犯罪立法上的表述与行为无价值理念相吻合,确保了严密的反恐刑事法网,故在司法上应该以二元的行为无价值以及《刑法》第13条"但书"为指导,确保法律反恐的递进性以及社会保护与人权保障之间的相对平衡性,这个神圣的天平应该是"倾斜"而不是"倾倒"。The legislation of preparation crime, act crime and possession crime in terrorism crime reflects the active eriminal law, early legal interest protection and rigorous anti - terrorism legislation in modern risk society. The legislative notion is gradually changing from handlungsunwert to erfolgsunwert. Erfolgsunwert paying attention to the normative function and the positive general prevention gets the legitimacy basis due to the significant legal interests behind the conduct, which is more lively than ertblgsunwert. The present terrorism crime legislation is consistent with the pure handlungsunwert to en- sure strict anti -terrorism criminal law, so the judicial practice should be guided by bihandlungsunwert and the ＂ proviso＂ of article 13 of the criminal law to ensure the relative balance of anti - terrorism progressive laws and the relative balance between social protection and the protection of human rights. This sacred balance should be ＂tilted＂ instead of ＂dumping＂.

关 键 词：恐怖主义犯罪 法益早期化 抽象危险犯 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]