检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘家彬[1] LIU Jiabin(Department of Communication Engineering,Beijing Institute of Petro-chemical Technology,Beijing 102617,China)
机构地区:[1]北京石油化工学院通信工程系,北京102617
出 处:《北京石油化工学院学报》2018年第3期77-80,共4页Journal of Beijing Institute of Petrochemical Technology
摘 要:比较了长期演进LTE(long-term evolution,LTE)系统下行链路OFDM(Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing,OFDM,)容量和宽带码分多址WCDMA(wideband code division multiple access,WCDMA)系统下行链路容量。在接收端采用Rake接收机的情况下,OFDM与WCDMA的主要区别是后者在多径弥散衰落信道环境下会造成严重的码间干扰。如果没有多径,即在单径平坦衰落信道下,OFDM容量和WCDMA容量相差无几,容量的差别取决于多径干扰的程度。一般来说,在多径弥散衰落信道环境下传输信号的带宽越宽,多址干扰越严重,OFDM对WCDMA的优势越明显。In this paper, we compare the downlink capacity performance of LTE (Long Term Evolution) (or OFDM for short) and WCDMA (Wideband Code Division Multiple Access) systems. A key difference between LTE OFDM (Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing) and WCDMA with Rake receiver is that the latter suffers from ISI (Inter Symbol Interference) in multi-path dispersive fading channels. In the absence of multi-paths, which is the case for a single-path flat-fading channel, the capacity performance of OFDM and WCDMA is similar. The capacity performance difference between OFDM and WCDMA depends upon the extent of multi-path interference. In general, the use of larger bandwidths in multi-path dispersive fading channels leads to more multi-path interference and therefore favoring OFDM which is expected to provide the greatest advantage over WCDMA.
关 键 词:长期演进 正交频分复用 宽带码分多址 RAKE接收机 多径干扰
分 类 号:TN914.3[电子电信—通信与信息系统]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.14.64.102