检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵益鑫[1] ZHAO Yi-xin
出 处:《哈尔滨体育学院学报》2018年第5期67-73,共7页Journal of Harbin Sport University
摘 要:采用文献资料、录像观察、数理统计和秩和比等研究方法,对2017-2018赛季中国女子篮球甲级联赛(WCBA)季后赛8支球队的攻防实力进行综合量化的数据统计分析,并对总决赛两支球队的攻防技术指标进行比较分析。研究结果表明:季后赛8支球队的RSR值与比赛成绩排名两者呈非常显著相关,攻防RSR值与比赛成绩排名两者呈非常显著相关;本赛季总决赛北京和山西两支球队,在进攻端,北京在得分、2分球命中数、3分球命中率、罚球命中数、罚球命中率、进攻篮板、助攻和失误数据指标上均好于山西,山西仅在2分球命中率和3分球命中数方面略强于北京,北京的进攻能力强过山西;在防守端北京队的各项防守数据指标均优于山西,北京的防守能力好于山西。By means of literature survey, video observation, mathematical statistics and rank sum ratio, this paper makes a comprehensive quantitative data analysis on the offensive and defensive strength of 8 teams in the 2017 -2018 season of the Chinese Women's Basketball League (WCBA) season, and compares the offensive and defensive technical indexes of the two teams in the finals. The results show that, the RSR value of the 8 teams in the playoffs and the correlation coefficient of the competition results are very significant, the correlation coefficient between the attack and defense RSR value and the peffomlance ranking is R = - 0. 888 (P 〈 0.01 ) ; in the finals of the season, Beijing and Shanxi are in the offensive end, Beijing is better in the score and the number of 2 points, the 3 points of hit rate, the number of free throws, the hit rate of free throw, the offensive rebounds, assists and roTors than those in Shanxi. Shanxi is only a little stronger than Beijing in 2 points and 3 points, while Beijing is better than Shanxi on the offensive ability, and in the defensive end. The defense data of Beijing are all superior to Shanxi. Beijing has a better defensive ability than Shanxi.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.42