检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:毛铖[1]
机构地区:[1]湖北省社会科学院"三农"问题研究中心,湖北武汉430077
出 处:《求实》2018年第5期90-108,共19页Truth Seeking
基 金:国家社科基金一般项目"精准扶贫视阈下我国农业社会化服务体系重构研究"(16BJY116);湖北省社会科学基金重点项目"新时代抓党建促乡村振兴问题研究"(HBSK2018Z DJZ003)
摘 要:以湖北咸安区"以钱养事"改革为代表的农村公共服务体制改革探索历经十余年,却并未沿着改革设想而发展,始终未完成改革目标,而且引发政府、市场与社会主体在农村服务供给中的"三重"失灵,导致供给与需求严重脱节,供需矛盾不断激化。基于实证研究来追本溯源,反观"以钱养事"改革的十年历程,当前农村公共服务改革仍然面临效难发挥、力难汇聚、发展难续的现实困境,呈现出多元化的现实形态。究其根源,源自既有农村治理体制所产生的多重体制性错位、体制性冲突与排斥以及改革本身所隐藏的机制性改革悖论。以农村公共服务体制的社会化重构为核心的持续性改革创新势在必行。The rural public service reforms represented by the reform of indirect administration in Xian'an District of Hubei Province have lasted over ten years; however,it has not developed as expected,and has never reached the reform goal,instead,it triggered the triple failure of government,market and social organizations in the supply of rural public services and led to a serious disconnect between supply and demand,as a result,the contradiction between supply and demand has intensified. Reviewing the ten-year reform,we can find that the current rural public service reform still faces the dilemma of low efficiency and cohesion and unsustainable development. This can be attributed to the multiple institutional dysfunction,institutional conflicts and exclusions generated by the rural governance system,and the institutional paradox hidden in the reform itself. It is imperative to carry out continuous reform and innovation with the socialized reconstruction of the rural public service system as the core.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117