检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王宇[1] 陶于[1] Wang Yu;Tao Yu(Sport Science College of Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210097,Jiangsu,China)
机构地区:[1]南京师范大学体育科学学院,江苏南京210097
出 处:《体育科技文献通报》2018年第10期71-73,77,共4页Bulletin of Sport Science & Technology
摘 要:里约奥运会落幕已两年,可其间发生的关于中国运动员争议判罚的事件相信仍在国人的脑海中挥之不去。吕斌绝对优势被判负、孙一文遭争议无缘金牌、女子沙排重赛和女子4×100m接力被挤出决赛等多个明显的争议判罚无一不引发我们的深思,是什么造成了这样的"悲剧"的发生,谁又来为这些运动员的遭遇"买单"?本文采用述评的方式,对里约奥运会上关于中国运动员的部分争议判罚进行逐一评析,从而得出今后应对此类事件的启示。The 2016 Rio Summer Olympics has been over for 2 years, but those controversial penalties over Chinese athletes can not be forgotten easily. Lv Bin' s absolute advantage was sentenced to negative. Sun Yiwen failed in the semifinals. The Women' s Beach Volleyball players was sentenced to replay the game point ball. Chinese Women' s 4 * 100m relay was out of the finals due to the USA team's single replay. All of these penalties have made us ponder. What caused the unffaimess and who will reimburse the athletes becomes a big problenm.This paper makes analysis on these eases one by one in the commentary way and reveals enlightenment for dealing with similar eases in future.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249