基于电力生产环节的英美电力市场成本覆盖对比分析  

Cost coverage comparison analysis of British and American electricity markets based on the electricity production

作　　者：高怡静 魏路平 林凯颖 郑亚先 王蓓蓓[1] 朱炳铨[2] GAO Yi-jing;WEI Lu-ping;LIN Kai-ying;ZHENG Ya-xian;WANG Bei-bei;ZHU Bing-quan(School of Electrical Engineering,Southeast University,Nanjing 210096,China;State Grid Zhejiang Electric Power Company,Hangzhou 310000,China;Nanjing Branch of China Electric Power Research Institute,Nanjing 210008,China)

机构地区：[1]东南大学电气工程学院,南京210096 [2]国网浙江省电力公司,杭州310000 [3]中国电科院南京分院,南京210008

出　　处：《电力需求侧管理》2018年第5期60-64,共5页Power Demand Side Management

基　　金：国家电网公司科技项目"省级电力现货市场运营推演平台研究与开发"(52110118000A)

摘　　要：在电力市场化改革进程中,欧美国家成熟的电力市场运营对我国电力市场建设有重要的借鉴经验。从电力生产成本覆盖的角度,以英国电力库时期、NETA时期和美国PJM时期电力市场为例,在简单介绍3种电力市场模式结构的基础上,深入分析对比三者在电力生产环节——发电侧、输电侧、变电和配电侧的成本覆盖情况,以宏观介绍和微观比较相结合的方式阐述在不同时期及市场环境下的电力市场交易模式与规则。In tHe process of electricity market reform, the market construction of Americau and European electricity markets can provide important reference value for China. POOL, NETA and PJM electricity markets are taken as the examples to analyze the cost coverage in the process of electricity- production. In tHe part of market composition, the trading mechanism of three markets are ex- plaine from a macro perspective. In the part of cost coverage, the cost generation and corresponding way of cost coverage is analyzed from three aspects：generation, transmission and distribution. The overall introduction and detailed comparisons from different as- pects are combined to explain the electricity market models and rules under the different periods and market environment.

关 键 词：电力市场 成本覆盖 PJM NETA 电力库 

分 类 号：F416.61[经济管理—产业经济] TK018[动力工程及工程热物理]