新《反不正当竞争法》对商业秘密保护之管窥  

An Analysis of Further Improvement of Protection Mechanism of Trade Secrets in the New Anti-Unfair Competition Law

作　　者：王雪 WANG Xue(Law School of Nanjing University,Nanjing Jiangsu 210093)

机构地区：[1]南京大学法学院,江苏南京210093

出　　处：《江南大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2018年第5期52-57,共6页Journal of Jiangnan University：Humanities & Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：江苏省法学会2012年重点项目:民间融资法律问题研究(SFH2012A02);国家社科基金一般项目:证券内幕交易构成和证明的疑难法律问题研究(13BFX105)

摘　　要：新《反不正当竞争法》于2017年11月获得通过,对1993年《反不正当竞争法》第10条"侵犯商业秘密"的条款进行了最终修改。整体而言"新竞争法"提升了对商业秘密的保护程度,但并无实质意义上的改变,如对商业秘密的定性不当、侵犯商业秘密的主体范围依然狭窄、举证规则仍未确立以及保密令制度的缺失。故此次修订还有诸多方面需要完善,如将商业秘密定性为法益、将职工纳入侵犯商业秘密的主体,确立诉讼中的举证规则与增添保密令制度。The new “Anti-unfair Competition Act” was adopted in November 2017, which eventually amended Article 10 “infringement of trade secrets” of the “Anti-unfair Competition Law” issued in 1993. On the whole, the “new competition law” has enhanced the protection of trade secrets, but it has not been changed substantially. For example, improper classification of commercial secrets, the narrow scope of infringement of commercial secrets, the unestablished rules of proof and the lack of confidentiality agreement. Therefore, there are still many aspects that need to be improved in this revision, such as making trade secret legal interest, incorporating employees into subjects that violate commercial secrets, establishing the rules of evidence in the lawsuit and adding the system of confidentiality agreements.

关 键 词：商业秘密 主体 举证规则 保密令 

分 类 号：D922.29[政治法律—经济法学]