“一国”与“两制”的工具性实现:对香港报纸的内容分析(1998-2016)  

The Instrumental Actualization of “One country” and “Two systems”: A Content Analysis of Hong Kong Newspaper(1998-2016)

作　　者：钟智锦[1] 周志成 

机构地区：[1]中山大学传播与设计学院,广东广州510006 [2]网易(杭州)网络有限公司,浙江杭州310052

出　　处：《新闻大学》2018年第4期63-71,共9页Journalism Research

基　　金：中山大学粤港澳发展研究院课题"‘一国两制’话语在香港的转化和传播研究";广州市大数据与公共传播重点研究基地的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：本研究以"媒介化冲突中的工具性实现理论"和"属性议程设置理论"为基础,研究香港报纸在回归后如何建构"一国两制"。本文运用内容分析方法,对1998年1月1日至2017年1月1日之间随机抽取的842篇新闻报道进行分析。研究发现,香港社会对"一国两制"的理解差异在媒体上集中体现为"国族"议题与"自治""民主"等"本土利益"相关议题的话语争夺。不同政治立场的媒体在对"一国两制"这一政治议题的评价倾向上,都呈现出显著的差异。关于"一国两制"的未来,除左派报纸持乐观立场之外,其他报纸绝大多数持中立态度。左派、右派媒体各自肩负代表自身利益群体的使命,在属性报道和立场评价方面旗帜鲜明、立场稳固,中间派媒体对政府的批评最为猛烈,亲左、亲右派媒体则呈现出"似左非左""似右非右"的策略。Based on the theory of instrumental actualization in mediated conflicts and the theory of attribute agenda setting,this study uses the method of content analysis to analyze 842 news articles about"One country,two systems"in Hongkong media from 1998 to 2017.The results show that the different understanding of"One country,two system"exists in the battle between the discourses about"country"(sovereignty)and"local"(autonomy).Newspapers with different political background perform differently in their evaluation about the attributes of"One country,two system",such as the central government,the local government,the effect and the future of the policy.Leftwing media plays an important role in delivering the governmental idea of the central government and are more optimistic about"One country,two system",whereas right-wing media are more critical.In comparison,neutral media tend to hold objective or sometimes vague opinion,which is also an instrumental approach for them to survive in the conflicts among different political powers.

关 键 词：一国两制 工具性实现 媒介化冲突 香港 

分 类 号：G206.3[文化科学—传播学]