检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:洪艺云 林功标[2] 林昶[2] 叶胜难[2] HONG Yiyun;LIN Gongbiao;LIN Chang;YE Shengnan(Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery,Ningde Municipal Hospital affil-iated of Fujian Medical University,Ningde Institute of Otolaryngology,Ningde,352100,Chi-na;Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery,the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University)
机构地区:[1]福建医科大学附属宁德市医院耳鼻咽喉科宁德市耳鼻咽喉科研究所,福建宁德352100 [2]福建医科大学附属第一医院耳鼻咽喉科
出 处:《临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志》2018年第17期1304-1308,共5页Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head And Neck Surgery
摘 要:目的:探讨影响成人咽旁(咽后)间隙脓肿手术与否的临床危险因素。方法:回顾性分析2006-01-2017-12期间97例成人咽旁和(或)咽后间隙脓肿患者的资料,采用多因素Logistic分析筛选危险因素。结果:共97例患者,立即手术组34例,延时手术组32例,药物治疗组31例,手术率为68%;单独药物治疗成功率为32%。所有患者均经手术切开引流配合足量有效抗生素或单独药物治疗治愈。脓肿直径>2.37cm既是增加手术治疗风险的危险因素,也是增加药物治疗失败风险的危险因素(P<0.001,P=0.002)。平均住院日手术组为17.26d,单独药物治疗组为10.26d,手术组住院日长于药物治疗组(P<0.001)。糖尿病组与非糖尿病组手术率差异无统计学意义(χ~2=0.523,P>0.05)。糖尿病与多间隙脓肿之间无相关性(r=-0.032,P=0.760)。结论:手术切开引流配合足量有效抗生素是成人咽旁(咽后)间隙脓肿的主要治疗方法,但不是所有患者均需手术治疗,脓肿直径是影响手术与否的危险因素。对于脓肿较大者应积极术前准备,尽早手术介入;而对于脓肿较小者,往往单独药物治疗就可以治愈,应避免手术切开引流,以减少手术并发症并缩短住院日。Objective:To identify the clinical risk factors related to the increased likelihood of surgical drainage and medical therapy failure in parapharyngeal and retropharyngeal abscess.Method:The charts of 93 consecutive patients from January 2006 to April 2017 with parapharyngeal and retropharyngeal abscess were reviewed retrospectively.Logistic regression analysis was used to study the clinical risk factors.Result:A total of 97 adult patients,there were 34 cases in the immediate surgical drainage group and 32 cases in the delayed surgical drainage group and 31 cases treated with medical therapy alone.The rate of operation therapy was 68%,and the success rate of the medical therapy alone was 32%.All patients had successful resolution of their abscesses by medical therapy and(or)surgical drainage.The average length of stay(17.26 d)in the surgical drainage group was longer than the medical therapy group(10.26 d),and the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.001).The maximum dimension of abscess〉2.37 cm is not only the risk factor of increasing likelihood of surgical drainage,but also that of medical therapy failure(P〈0.001,P=0.002).The factors affecting the hospitalization day were whether or not the operation was performed.There was no significant difference in operative rate between diabetic group and non-diabetic group(χ^2=0.523,P〉0.05).There were no correlation between diabetes mellitus and the multiple space abscesses(r=-0.032,P=0.760).Conclusion:Although a majority of adult parapharyngeal and retropharyngeal abscesses were treated with surgical drainage and sufficient effective intravenous antibiotics,but not all patients need surgical treatment.The diameter of the abscess is a risk factor affecting the operation or not.For those with larger abscesses,the preoperative preparation should be actively prepared and the operation should be intervened as early as possible;for those with smaller abscess,the treatment can be cured alone,and the surgical incision and drai
关 键 词:咽旁脓肿 咽后脓肿 危险因素 LOGISTIC分析
分 类 号:R766.9[医药卫生—耳鼻咽喉科]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90